Self-Explanatory
dailyhuff:

skybarn:

whatevs:
A national “koke”, eh Belonsky? Brillz, just brillz. This story has been up for almost 8 hours! ON THE INDEX PAGE, NO LESS. Where is your pride, man?
I’m pretty sure Belonsky is the worst writer I’ve ever seen for a major publication, internet or otherwise. And, with that name, I’m supposed to love him: http://www.themorningnews.org/archives/spoofs_satire/barnosky_and_i.php
Replacing Cajun with this dude continues to be one of the most confounding decisions I’ve seen them make at Gawker. I think Denton stopped actually giving much of a fuck about content a long time ago. As long as it contains some forced snark, isn’t out-and-out plagiarism, it’ll fly, apparently.

Oh wait, this is better than Gawklr. Confounding indeed. Although more troubling than Belonsky’s typo is his reference to Jindal’s bumbling fatuousness as “that laughable speech.” Really? That’s it? I thought you were supposed to be punchy! Those sunglasses were so misleading.

dailyhuff:

skybarn:

whatevs:

A national “koke”, eh Belonsky? Brillz, just brillz. This story has been up for almost 8 hours! ON THE INDEX PAGE, NO LESS. Where is your pride, man?
I’m pretty sure Belonsky is the worst writer I’ve ever seen for a major publication, internet or otherwise. And, with that name, I’m supposed to love him: http://www.themorningnews.org/archives/spoofs_satire/barnosky_and_i.php

Replacing Cajun with this dude continues to be one of the most confounding decisions I’ve seen them make at Gawker. I think Denton stopped actually giving much of a fuck about content a long time ago. As long as it contains some forced snark, isn’t out-and-out plagiarism, it’ll fly, apparently.

Oh wait, this is better than Gawklr. Confounding indeed. Although more troubling than Belonsky’s typo is his reference to Jindal’s bumbling fatuousness as “that laughable speech.” Really? That’s it? I thought you were supposed to be punchy! Those sunglasses were so misleading.